EpsonWorkforce WF-110 Wireless Color Mobile Printer,White, Small,Black

So far so good, but this is my second one. My first one was stolen. Bit pricey but very convenient. fits in my laptop bag along with the scanner. First two days paid for itself when time is sensitive. also very impressive with clients. originate documents on my lap top, print, wet signatures, scan for copies, reprint or send PDF at any location. used hot spot on my phone to connect or just plug and play. maybe the only thing that works right in life. LOL.

My first epson wf100 lasted 7 yrs! When it finally wouldn't take a charge anymore i bought the Wf110.So far it has been just as good as the wf100 i had. Hopefully this one lasts 7yrs like the first one.Its compact prints great and easy to set up.I travel for a living and this fits the bill just right.

I have always used Epson. Then had one develope problems. No one fixes printers around here so I bought this little mobile WF-110 and its a gem. Does everything it claims.. doesn't try to block access to my work to sell me something (had that recently with another brand) and does a great print job.Yes to the WF-110..Easy set upPrints as soon as you recognize it Small enough to share a desk with a AIO computer.

I have been using Cannon Pixma portable printers for the past 15 years, and wanted to get a smaller design, with a built in battery. The Epson Workforce WF-110 fit my needs to the tee. I purchased the unit on June 1, and have now owned and operated the machine for 45 days. Based on this usage, it is strikingly clear that the operating expenses for this machine is much more than what I had with my Pixma printers.1- Even when printing at the lowest draft quality, the ink cartridges do not last as long, and I am having to change cartridges about 50% more frequently than with Pixma. It used to take me about 6 weeks of use before I had to replace my Pixma cartridges. These cartridges last only about 4 weeks at the same level of use as when I used the Pixma. For the Epson Workforce, it costs about $40 for a combo pack of a single black ink cartridge and single color cartridge, while for the Pixma it costs about $41 for a combo back of 2 black ink cartridges and 1 color cartridge. So not only do the Pixma catriges last longer, they are cheaper, considering the two black cartridges. My rough estimate is that my ink costs have gone up by about $20 a month, for an annualized increase of $240.2) An annoying feature of the Workforce is that when the low ink notification goes off, its prevents the printer from printing. With my previous Cannon Pixma, the low ink notification could be overridden, and thus I was able to override the notification, and continue printing until the cartridge was actually empty. Since I cannot override the Epson low ink notification, I am being forced to change the cartridges even when the print quality is not suffering due to low ink.3- The Epson also frequently generates lines in the printed document. This requires printer head cleanings, which means that I will have to reprint the effected pages, which of course wastes ink. Also, even when the low ink notice has not appeared, but the ink level graphic indicator shows low, print head cleaning is not allowed, and requires a replacement of the ink cartridges before the printer head cleaning can be done. It appears to me that the frequent print head cleaning wastes precious ink, further accelerating ink use.4- The Epson Workforce 110 features a removable "maintenance box." This appears to capture excess ink. When the box is full, it needs to be replaced. The cost of the box is about $12 after sales tax. Under my use, the box fills up after about 4 weeks. Extrapolating over the year, this comes to an additional operating cost of $144. The pixma does have a system to capture excess ink, but under my use, it takes about 4 years for this to fill up.If I knew back in June what I know today, I would NOT have purchased this Epson Workforce WF 110 printer, as my operating costs are about about $380 more a year than when using Pixma. Given that the printer itself cost $350 after tax, the extra operating cost is more than the cost of the printer. It is now past the return date for this printer, and I am now stuck paying for overpriced ink. To add insult to injury, it appears to me that the printer is either poorly designed to allow optimal ink usage, or purposely designed to maximize ink cartridge sales, with the added benefit of maximizing sales of maintenance boxes.

The Q&A section says it will support Bluetooth connectivity, but it doesn't. Why would you make a portable printer that can print from an iPhone, but only when connected to a network. When I'm in the field sitting in my car with no internet connectivity, how can I use my iPhone to print a contract?

Light portable printer, works very well

Just arrived yesterday. Set-up was easy. Print quality is good. I use it for printing documents. I don't print photos.

Very portable-easy to take to work. Not the quickest printer but it provides a good looking print sheet and it’s pretty quiet. The battery life lasted me all day; it turns off after no use but to get it restarted took 15 seconds. Color-wise, I think it does a great job for such a small package.