CarharttMen's Force Midweight Classic Thermal Base Layer Pant
K**A
I'm a trans man and these are my favorite pants now
I bought a Large. I am 5'4" and 160lb. Inseam 26". Hips at widest point 43". Waist at belly button 38". I am wider at the hips than the shoulder, my body shape is not the same as the target market for these pants, so buying 'mens' clothes is always a gamble. And this time it turned out! Here are the things I love about these pants: they are so so soft, light, and warm. They stretch over my hips easily. I wear them as pajama/hanging around the house pants. My favorite part of the day is when I can put them on again. Here are the things I dislike about the pants but are not dealbreakers for me: they are a couple inches too long, I have to roll them up sometimes. And the elastic waistband is a little too tight and folds in half. Overall, very gender-affirming, comfy thermals. I have not tried to wear them under pants, but I don't think it would be a problem.
F**N
Great product
Very comfortable, works well, very happy with these. Much better than old long John’s
J**Y
Warm and light
This was a gift for my son who was heading to Colorado for a ski trip. He stayed warm and dry, without feeling weighted down with heavy layers. Would buy again.
A**.
More lightweight, runs small
Bought these for light hiking and snow blowing the property. Ordered an XL so they would fit me length wise and waist wise (33-34" inseam) they're a teeny bit shorter than I expected, a little baggy on the calves and thighs but a bit tight at the waist. Which is weird. I'm not as slim as I used to be, but I have large, muscular legs and an average waist(35-36in pants). For the waist to be tight and the legs to be a little roomy is very, very uncommon especially for base layers. I almost always have a loose waist and tights because of the size and length.That being said, they're fine enough. I'm not doing yoga in them. I can bend over and stretch and crouch down all fine with little to no restriction in movement. I would say my biggest gripe is them being called midweight advertised for pretty cold temps and they're more light-to-mid weight. I wouldn't use them for a trip in the snow for more than maybe 2 hour or so at a time. I'd use them if I worked outside and made frequent trips in doors or inside of a vehicle. But I wouldn't use them to sit in a blind and hunt for 8 hours. Which I think is fair considering their price point. I'd recommend preparing to order and return at least one pair to get the sizing right. Other than that, not too bad. I like them and continue to wear them.
T**.
Comfortable and durable
Used for 2 winters now, not showing any wear and are great thermals especially for how low profile they are.
T**O
They Fit. Well.
I'm slim, 6'5" and the Large Tall fits perfectly. Normally wear a 34/35 waist. Finally a pair of non-bandaid-colored long johns that are long and I don't need safety pins to keep them on. Baggy enough in all the right places and tight enough they stay against your skin comfortably. Cant speak to the warmth or durability yet, but the legs cover the ankle and stop right at the foot. Excellent!
M**M
Keeps you warm on those cold winter days !
Carhart has great quality. Gotta pay more to get a good quality.
R**R
Satisfied Customer
Fit is very good. Length is just right and is very comfortable in the cold. My initial wear was at work driving cars in/out of -15 degree wind chill weather.
M**H
Overall very happy!
I'm 6'3" and about 285 lbs (out of shape). These fit me well as I followed the size guideline. They're a tiny bit loose around the ankles but nothing worth worrying about. Overall, I'm very happy with the price, fit and quality.
S**O
Se recomienda
La talla es la normal para unos jeans, son comodos y abrigadores. Se recomiendan
C**
Great long johns!
It does the job, warm legs :)
T**N
Good light weight long-johns
Good build quality and are a perfect fit on me. Good for cold weather.
J**N
Carhartt thermal pants
Look good but I ordered the type that has synthetic wool in them and these ones aren't there waffle base so the description is incorrect on these
Trustpilot
1 month ago
1 month ago