End in Fire

In "End in Fire" Syne Mitchell, one of sf's outstanding new voices, goes back to the middle of the last century and lovingly re-creates a classic "problem" tale--one in which a group of people (typically spacefarers, as here) are confronted with a life-threatening situation and who must, with pluck, luck, and good old American knowhow, save themselves from disaster.That happens here, as nuclear war (another favorite theme from the mid-20th century, of course) breaks out between China and India, and intrepid Claire must get her team of astronauts back to Earth. There's a gender-bending twist--Claire has a young son and a husband at home--but other than that the story could easily have appeared in 1956.This is far from a bad effort, but (especially if you're a longtime sf-fan) it's possible you'll wonder why this gifted and original writer wanted to do this. It's like a talented singer-songwriter who spins out a whole album of covers--and covers that are merely syllable for syllable renditions of the originals at that. You may get some insight into the kind of material that influenced her when she was young, but maybe you wish she'd discovered something new in the tunes.

One of the first science fiction books that I read was "Alas, Babylon," by Pat Frank, which was written back in the early 1960's. Therefore, when I saw this book, I figured I'd see what new ideas had come up.There were a couple of flaws I found, one of which was that some characters seemed to be developed purely to be thrown away. The fate of one of these characters (a NASA launch director who bucks the bureaucracy to send a rescue mission) is left in a murky limbo that seemed more irritating than anything else. Another was that there seemed to be she tends to try to drive her point home about kicking the fossil fuel addiction with a 9-pound sledgehammer.Having said that, I have also to say that they are minor flaws. In contrast to those, I was highly impressed with the author's attention to technical details. I believe she did an excelent job in communicating the tension of living in what amounted to a deteriorating tin can. Her depiction of the total breakdown in world-wide communications was highly effective, as were her characterizations.I recommend this book quite highly. It will probably not light up your life, but if it makes you think... then all the better.

Hi, I'm Syne Mitchell, the author of this book. I'm not going to speak to the quality of the writing because, obviously, I'm biased. ;> But here's some behind-the-scenes comments about the book I thought you might find interesting.The idea for END IN FIRE came from the 1970's, when the whole world seemed on the brink of nuclear war. These days we don't think much about the nuclear arsenals we still have--and which countries like India, Pakistan, and North Korea are developing--but the threat of nuclear war hasn't disappeared. And given the havoc a high-altitude nuclear explosion would cause for satellite communications, we are in some ways more vulnerable than ever.End in Fire was a blast to write (if you'll forgive the pun.) I got to interview NASA astronauts--one of whom had even read my previous book, TECHNOGENESIS--so it was both a thrill and an honor. In some ways, this book is MURPHY'S GAMBIT done right. Now that I'm a more mature writer, I could bring more characterization and atmosphere to the story. This was also the first book written after the birth of my son, which changes your perspective on the world, and the future in particular.I hope you'll give END IN FIRE a read, and I look forward to your comments on Amazon.com.Best Wishes,Syne Mitchell[...]P.S. Please forgive the five-star rating, I would have preferred not to rate the book, but Amazon.com wouldn't let me post without one.

I love all her books, wish they where audio books.

I hesitate to express what I believe to be shortcomings in a book that does not purport to be anything that it is not. Ripping off a nice thriller once and awhile has always been a favorite activity. But "End in Fire" couldn't quite decide what it was going to be. There are seeds of several excellent stories but I believe that the author unintentionally blunted the impact of each thematic opportunity by sacrificing characterization to the demands of action and plot. The author is trying too hard. Great artists make the work look effortless. Great authors have a story so finely developed that you know exactly what the characters are doing and why; crucially, the reader cares why. Otherwise, it is as if you are watching a TV movie where you know that everything will wrap up with a nice satisfactory ending in time for the 11:00 news broadcast.The hugely relevant issue of what would happen in the event of a nuclear exchange would have itself been a very interesting premise. It is about time someone revisited the issue: Brinkley's "The Last Ship" comes to mind and here we have the perspective of astronauts rather than sailors. Some serious thought went into the framing of the nuclear exchange, interesting observations included the importance of ham radio operators, the dependence of society on satellites, vulnerability to EMP, etc. I admire an author willing to push the button as it were, but the opportunity to make any conclusions or to develop the theme was missed.The characterizations were also rife with missed opportunity. None of the characters developed during the story. Our proud, self-sufficient mother-astronaut who shouldn't have left her baby didn't learn anything from her journey. The others who accompanied her at various times were little more than shadows. The more I read and the older I get the more I appreciate a finely-drawn character. You can put such characters in the most outrageously contrived situations and the story will move along nicely--Neal Stephenson has a gift for that.SPOILER WARNING! There was an entire book lurking in the space rescue, which was horribly abbreviated. Sure, the whole thing smacked of dramatic hyperbole--but hey, a dramatic space rescue is what kept me reading. Here it pushed the bounds a bit much--reentry is difficult enough with all of the computers. Apollo 13 would have provided a little foundation for the framing of a crisis situation. All you need is a little hole in the craft. Reengineering a reentry vehicle on the fly--in space no less--was just over the top. As for reentry itself... I won't go there. Suffice it to say that it is reminiscent of the cartoon with scientists at a chalk board full of equations and the words at the bottom corner "Then a Miracle Occurs" and one scientist says to the other something to the effect of "there needs to be a little more detail here."I will watch Ms. Mitchell's future efforts as I do think that the seeds of some excellent writing are present--but can't get past 3 stars on this one.