UHF Wireless Lavalier Microphone System, FULAIM WM300 20-Channel Lavalier Lapel Mic with Rechargeable Transmitter and Receiver for Recording YouTube, Interview, Vlogging, Conference, Church - 1TX

I have been using this with a Sony camera and it works really well. Easy to pair and work and the sound quality is decent. You do have to bear in mind the price, if you have the money a Rode GoMic is probably better. If you want to use this outdoors, I suggest you get a more effective windshield than the included foam.Pros:Cheap.Easy to use.Very good spoken vocal sound quality.Reasonably well made.Small and lightweight.Lavalier mic included so you can hide the body pack.2-3 hours of use and didn't run flat.Low latency.Everything you need to get going included.Cons:Recharegable so if you run out of juice they are out of action till you recharge.Instructions re changing frequencies are a bit confusing.Careful of the gain structure of your setup, they can get a bit hissy.Relatively short range 20m for me.Had a couple of signal drops the first time I used them. Been OK since.Frequency and dynamics not great, not really for instrument use, could be the inexpensive mic that's included.Given the price I am sure you could NOT get better value for money. I would thoroughly recommend them.

This has worked really well for our small project. It does have to be pretty close to the mouth to work well, and one mic stopped working after 2 days (we were working with kids so it got a bit of a hammering), but we couldn’t afford anything spectacular so I’m very pleased with the overall performance.I was using it with an iPhone converter which worked pretty well. The headphone socket on the receiver was also really handy. I also liked the fact that it was easy to replace the mic that stopped working with a spare someone else had.In summary- a little fragile, but sound quality SO much better than just using a camcorder or phone. Really easy to set up and use and all charging cables included.

Do your videos and podcasts sound as if they were recorded in the bathroom? Can you barely make out what the person you’re filming is talking about even though they are practically shouting while you film them? Would your telephoto video of the lesser-crested blue footed booby bird benefit from the sound of its warble? A lavalier microphone clipped to the subject’s clothes or placed nearby is clearly the answer, and a wireless one is like a wired lavalier on speed. But they cost hundreds, don’t they?This one doesn’t, but it’s still good.Packaging feels almost up to Apple quality, which is the benchmark and leads you in to the experience of owning this tiny beast. A cut-out foam tray holds the transmitter, receiver, a charging cable (charges both units at the same time which is handy…) the lavalier microphone on an adequate length of cable, and a 3.5mm male-to-male lead which plugs in to the receiver output then into your recording device (SLR, video camera, mixing desk or digital recorder).Once charged fully (it took about two hours from scratch) the device’s only other small failing became clear; or rather it didn’t. The frequency and volume setting display is not exactly… bright. Legible in a dark room but not in sunshine. A seasoned user won’t have to look at the screen to know what effect tapping the volume buttons will make, so I won’t dwell on it.And why UHF not VHF? UHF (ultra high frequency) signals operate at the higher end of the radio frequency spectrum.  They can more easily penetrate metal and concrete structures, which makes UHF radios a good choice in built-up areas like towns and cities, or for densely wooded or hilly areas. It also makes them popular for indoor use. In these environments, the radio signal is more easily transmitted through and around dense objects. Plus, the aerial’s shorter.So it’s charged up and plugged in… let’s see how this thing performs!It’s good. Bright and clear, plenty of bass. I’m impressed. And the base level’s good even with the volume set high. No audible hiss. It’s weird to hear someone distant in the viewfinder so clearly in the headphones I’m wearing which are plugged in (not supplied).So I’m sold on this wireless business. Range is - who knows? It seems to work as far as I need with no break up or loss of quality.Pretty good all round. Now if it was possible to make the display a bit brighter…

So far every time I've used this, I haven't been able to tell if it's been working. Because my camera has a microphone built in, I don't know whether it's that which is picking up the sound or not. Everything powers up but I can't work out whether the microphone is transmitting to the receiver, or that to the camera. The instructions are a series of pictures with no real information or troubleshooting.Apart from that minor detail it comes with cables for charging and connection to camera, phone or PC, and being wireless you can use it from a distance from the camera. I can't comment really on the sound quality; if it is working then I'd say it's a bit echoy.Overall not thrilled with this but I'll keep trying

Following some YouTube reviews, I decided to give the Fulaim WM300 wireless lav mic set a go.With such a low price point, I was really impressed with the quality. The transmitter was paired and ready to use, adjusting the levels quickly I was able to get crisp sound to make a good impression for a video interview. I did some testing outside and the distance range was impressive. I also noticed that there was basically no base noise, which I was not expecting for such a small and affordable kit. It’s not at sennheiser / saramonic level, but it’s also between a third and a fifth of the price.Good noise rejection, dynamics and tonal range. And I can also plug another mic to the transmitter If I want to.Great job!I also like the double charging cable and the fact that with a power bank it keeps going recording, so you don’t have to use AA batteries.This is probably the best entry-level wireless mic for anyone starting up a YouTube channel, doing a lot of conference calls or doing basic interviews setups.