🌠 Discover the Universe—One Star at a Time!
The Celestron 76mm Cometron FirstScope is a compact and portable tabletop Dobsonian telescope designed for beginners. Weighing just 2 pounds, it features a 76mm objective lens and a 300mm focal length, providing a wide field of view ideal for observing celestial objects. With a simple no-tool setup and included finderscope, this telescope is perfect for on-the-go stargazing. Plus, it comes with a bonus astronomy software package to enhance your cosmic journey.
Item Weight | 2 Pounds |
Item Dimensions D x W x H | 13"D x 10"W x 10"H |
Optical-Tube Length | 70 Millimeters |
Objective Lens Diameter | 76 Millimeters |
Finderscope | Reflex |
Focal Length Description | 300 millimeters |
Eye Piece Lens Description | Kellner |
Mount | Altazimuth Mount |
Zoom Ratio | 2:1 |
Coating | Multi-Coated |
Focus Type | Manual Focus |
Power Source | Battery Powered |
Field Of View | 1.78 Degrees |
M**G
The Most Adorable Newtonian Telescope
The telecope is pretty small. So, it's definitely a tabletop telescope. The alt-az Dobsonian-type mount is very easy to use. The 3-inch aperture diameter is good for a beginner's telescope, and for the low price. It comes with a decent finderscope and two Kellner eyepieces: 20 mm (15x) and 10 mm (30x). You can see the moon's craters even with the lower-power eyepiece. I tried to use a separate 3x Barlow lens, but I couldn't see anything. Perhaps it's a focal-length issue. Overall, I recommend this telescope. It makes for a better child's X'mas present than a similarly priced refractor.
A**R
A good absolute beginner's telescope with compromises
I was originally interested in getting into astronomy as a kid, but never did get a telescope. About two months ago, we were cleaning out the house of a recently deceased family member when we found a telescope. I went home and tried it out. However, since it was a Tasco, I wasn't getting good views at all. I decided to do something to dip my toe into astronomy, if you will, by buying this scope, since it is so inexpensive (notice I didn't say cheap).I got it in a reasonable amount of time (Amazon Prime is like that) and opened up the box. Celestron includes two eyepieces, a 20 MM and 10 MM. I believe them to be of Kellner design. While they're not Plossls, they are better than the cheap Huygens design eyepieces you get with a Tasco. They'll do fine for looking at the Moon and certain planets. Overall construction quality of the scope is solid; the plastics aren't glossy and cheap. The tabletop stand it comes on is probably a medium-density composite board with laminate over it. Again, solid; not cheap. However, that is not to say that this is a 100% fully-featured Newtonian telescope. Newtonians, because of their design, require that the two mirrors in the telescope occasionally be aligned properly, in a process called collimation. On the FirstScope, this is a bit of a challenge. For starters, no collimation cap or eyepiece is included in the box. I ended up purchasing one anyways, because I felt I'd need it for something else later on. When it comes to the actual adjustment part of the collimation process, you'll find it's more difficult on this telescope than more expensive models for the reason that the primary mirror (that's the one at the sealed end of the telescope) is not adjustable. The mirror is concave and set into the plastic cap by adhesive. On more expensive models, you'll usually see thumb screws for adjusting it. The secondary mirror (the one by the focuser that bounces light back into your eye) is adjustable, but it is held into place by one long screw instead of a spider. Again, this makes it harder to adjust. Ultimately, I got things to work, but it's something I wish I had known before. Your options as it relates to supporting this telescope are limited unless you can work out a platform mounted to a tripod. I find myself using the trunk lid of my car. It's not a great solution, but it is what it is.This telescope is probably best used for the Moon and planets. Being in a light-polluted larger city (and, as of the writing of this post, in the middle of a very cold Midwestern winter), I haven't had a chance to go and try out for more distant objects. It's possible to see some of the broader details on the Moon and see Jupiter and his larger moons with the provided eyepieces. I just purchased a Barlow eyepiece from a local store, so I'll update with what I see then.Overall, if you're asking if astronomy is for you, and you don't want to drop righteous bucks on a scope just to answer that question, you might be smart to order one of these. I'm enjoying the hobby and plan on purchasing a much more expensive scope soon to see what else is out in the heavens.
B**A
Great First Scope, fun for all
For this price and purpose this is an exceptional scope right out of the box. I did add a 2X Barlow and am enjoying a range of 6mm to 10mm to 15mm to 20mm lenses. Moon filter in-hand but haven’t needed it yet. Has the “look” of a much bigger scope and will be good for the practice of functions in case this is a long term hobby and we graduate up. Nice job, Celestron.I admit I would have paid more for a parabolic primary but this solid.
Y**1
Jupiter's 4 moons and Orion Nebula M42
This is my first telescope and it lets me see saturn and Jupiter. It is fun and very light to take anywhere you want. I bring it to my oversea travel to look at Orion nebula in Penang (Second photo). To make it easy to pack, I replace the dobsonian base with a camera tripod and relocate the finder view. I used iPhone 6 and saturnCam app to capture the Jupiter and its 4 moons. I have also see Saturn but it is only a blob in an oval shape with 10mm eyepiece. I use SpiralCam app to photo the Orion Nebula.
A**A
Came opened and missing parts
Like the title says, bought this as a present and is already opened, has finger print marks all over it and missing parts.
M**9
You get what you pay for.
I got mine used on Amazon for $35 shipped. Maybe it was returned for being bad. You decide if you want to pay $60 new and see what percentage are good.The 10mm eyepiece, which has a K on it supposedly for Kelner, looks to be a Huygen, with a 30° apparent field of view. Huygens are not terrible. At low power, they are more than wide enough to fit the moon, and find it in this case. Their resolution at their edges drops off much more than Kelner's and especially Plossl's.The finder has a baffle right behind the objective, which reduces the aperture to 16mm. The finder's eyepiece seems to be a Huygen. Very narrow field of view. Edit: I discovered the lens cover unscrews off, and you can push the baffle back to halfway, where it should be, then screw it all back together. So that part is fixed now.The focuser tube points to the side of the secondary but is loose enough you can wedge it to center by inserting a tooth pick. I think it is missing two slider pads. Folded paper might also do the trick. I think some clear tapes might have more friction than others.The secondary mirror is not aimed at the center of the primary, so you do need to know how to adjust the 3 screws to get it aimed. I opened the tube to center dot the primary. I also have a cheshire collimation eyepiece with crosshairs. It was not too hard to adjust, though it ran out of range. Maybe the focuser being off is what made me think the secondary needed more adjustment.The primary does not have adjustment screws per se, but you can losen the 3 attachment screws and wiggle it enough and then tighten them back down. f4 is not very forgiving on any misalignment.The base is good. I may have got my money's worth just because of the base, which I can use in another scope. It is not tall enough to use without a table, unless little kids like to get down on the ground, which many do.I focused on myself in the mirror from the other side of the room. The resolution is noticeably off. I can see more detail in my $30 7x monocular. The Cometron can focus even closer, so that is not the issue. The issue is I did not get the mirrors aligned enough, which has a big penalty at f4. I have to insert two focuser pads before I can align them better.I really wish I could recommend you a better scope. I've looked through many, and you will encounter trade offs, such as cost and weight. More power means harder to aim. Many say the $110 Orion SkyScanner is much better. It is a 100mm aperture table dob, also f4, but maybe better aligned from the factory. Many cheap refractors have wobbly mounts. I doubt a 6 year old could easily more around my Celestron Powerseeker 114mm, which has great optics for only $70 shipped. I had to make a few modifications to it to have any real fun.Many people recommend binoculars for newbies. They are inexpensive and small and let you learn the sky with a wide view. However, they do not zoom in on planets. In a light polluted city, you will prefer the magnification of a telescope for the moon. A mounted scope scan share views between people, whereas binoculars show different views to different people who don't know where it was aimed last.For the low price, you get what you pay for.
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
1 week ago