Occupational and Environmental Medicine Review: Pearls of Wisdom: Pearls of Wisdom

This is the expected book which contain just questions and which the doctors need to form the exams. The other books i ordered help for nothing and i think u need to let the customers to see what the contents of each book

Actually because this does book contains many points of esoterica, I found it to be a very useful adjunct in preparing for the boards. It is not a "bread and butter" text of Occupational Medicine--- La Dou, Levy & Wegman are fine examples that don't need to be replicated. This book helped reveal several topics that were on the Boards that I would have never thought to study otherwise and I am grateful that I did. It is a well-organized collection. Other than the typos that I would hope are corrected in future editions, I have no criticisms. As another reviewer has suggested, this is also a great resource if one wanted to play "Occupational Medicine Jeopardy," a fun way to supplement more arduous endeavors of study.

It has the basic framework of a review book. In addition to numerous grammatical errors, material which would be expected in the book is missing (i.e. where is respiratory system?). Unfortunately there are not a lot of review book in Occ med, if you believe you need this book, get it early and add material to the margins as you progress throughout residency.

I used this for review for the Occ Med boards and found it somewhat helpful. There were a lot of typos and grammatical errors in the book; there were also some inaccuracies. The pretest book for Prev Med was more helpful than this one.

I bought this to prepare for the ABPM occupational medicine boards. It focuses too much on trivia to be helpful for board preparation. I guess it could be helpful for someone who wants to play "Occupational Medicine Jeopardy." I did fine on the boards but as I was trying to work my way through this book in preparation, I thought I didn't know anything.

I have never seen a book with so many grammatical errors and typos that I can only question the validity of the material inside.